FREE ESSAY ON DEATH PENALTY

DEATH PENALTY

Advantages of Capital Punishment As much as people complain about the laws in the United
States are they strict enough? Are there any penalties for murder that are enough to
scare a person away from the crime they are planning to commit? The answer in most cases
is no, this is why the death penalty should be used in all states and more often. The
death penalty is a cost effective deterrent for the USA's problem of violet criminals.
The death penalty has been part of justices systems since the beginning of civilization.
It was used as a way to punish criminals for crimes of all types. The law was a lot
stricter in history, you could be executed for things such as stealing, being accused of
being a witch and many other things. The majority of the executions in history until
around the 1830's most countries performed the executions in public. Now there are very
few countries that hold public executions but it is not completely unheard of. The
methods of execution were also much more cruel. Methods such as burning at the stake,
stoning, thrown to animals, thrown from a cliff among other things. If anything, the
methods used today are a walk in the park compared to methods used throughout history.
When some people think of the death penalty they think that it is wrong for the
government to take away this persons life. When you stop to look at the Gulbin - 2
subject it is only fair and in the end it is in the best interest of the country. Every
year cold blooded killers are sentenced to life in prison, which is not fair when they
sentenced their victim to death. The problem in the USA today is we are not hard enough
on our violent criminals. There are to many repeat offenders who could have been stopped
the first time the committed a crime. In 1993 criminals on parole committed 84,800
crimes, this included 13,200 murders, 12,900 rapes and 49,500 robberies. Statistics like
these shows that some criminals are not effected by the penalties we give them. Criminals
have the upper hand in most cases. Around sixty two percent of violent crimes result in
death and even less result in jail time. The average person in jail for murder spends
just under three years before they are released. These criminals only loose three years
of their life while their victims lost all of it. Something is very wrong with these
statistics and something like the death penalty should be brought into effect to put an
end to it. The death penalty has the potential to be a very effective deterrent. If the
death penalty was enforced on a regular basis and at a swifter pace it would have
criminals scared stiff. One way to look at it is, how many people would commit a murder
if as soon as their victim died they would die. If this were the case not many people
would murder unless they also wanted to die. The problem in the US is we take to long to
carry out the process. Commute me or electrocute me, don't drag it out (Jesse Walter
Bishop). The average inmate on death row is there for nine years. This time costs the
state massive amounts of money. In those nine Gulbin - 3 years the state has to pay to
keep the inmate in prison but in addition they must pay for the countless appeals they
inmate carries out. If there was a limit and stricter grounds to place an appeal the
death penalty would be a cheap and permanent solution to killers. The death penalty is a
warning, just like a lighthouse throwing light beams out to sea. We hear about
shipwrecks, but do not hear about the ships the lighthouse guides safley on their way. We
don't have proof of the number of ships it saves, but we do not tear the light house down
(Hyam Barshay). This quote is showing that even though we can't say how many murders
capital punishment has prevented it is still known to help prevent people from killing.
Even with all the appeals and jail time, capital punishment is cheaper than life with out
parole. On average it costs three million dollars for a life without parole inmate. This
costs comes from the thirty four thousand per year for the cell for fifty years and
seventy five thousand dollars for the trial. On the other hand it only costs about one
point eight million dollars for an inmate severing a death sentence. This cost is from
the sixty thousand a year for the cell for six years and one point five million dollars
for the trial. The death penalty is cheaper now than life without parole and if there
were less appeals the whole thing would be even cheaper. One big question is what crimes
warrant the death of the perpetrator. The obvious one is murder. This goes with out
question, anyone who takes someone's Gulbin - 4 life in a premeditated murder should have
their life taken from them as well. Other crimes that may warrant a death sentence is
drug dealers. This may seem very harsh and outlandish but it would be sure to stop the
problem. Some people see drug dealing as a simple and easy way to make big money fast.
They understand there is a risk involved but not a very big one. They would be sure to
think twice if they were going to die if they were caught. In many countries in Asia they
have very strict rules like this and most of those countries are very safe to live in.
One example of this is Singapore. They have very strict rules, people can't even chew
gum, but when you walk down the streets they are all spotless and you don't have to worry
about being mugged. So while their rules may seem unfair, it makes the country a very
nice place to live in. Many people who oppose the death penalty argue that it is not
ethical to execute a murderer. When one stops to think about this, the statement does not
hold much water. This punishment seems to be the only fair punishment for someone who
took someone's life for whatever reason. an eye for an eye, someone took a persons life
and the same should happen to them. If someone close to an abolitionist was murdered they
would make a quick conversion to a supporter because they would want the criminal dead.
This is why most abolitionist are people who grew up in a well off family and in a nice
neighborhood. They support the penalty because chances are, they have never been affected
by a murder or a violent crime. Capital punishment not only serves Gulbin - 5 as
retribution for the victim but also for the family of the victim. It would not seem fair
that someone took a way a loved ones life and they spent a little time in jail, death is
the only fair punishment. Abolitionists also say that when the state executes someone, it
is really just like murder. If it is murder when the state executes a criminal, is it
kidnapping when we put inmates in a cell and they are held against their will? In both
cases the answer is no. There is a difference between premeditated murder and a criminals
execution. When a murderer kills someone, there is no trial, there was no crime
committed, there is no reason why that person should loose their life. An execution is
not wrong because this person has commitied a crime that's punishment is death. A big
issue is are the methods we use to execute criminals today painless and ethical? The
answer is no, today's methods are not always painless. All methods can be botched and
result in pain for the criminal. Is this fair to them? Some would say that it is wrong to
put them through that kind of pain, but one must imagine the fear and pain that the
victim was going through right before the inmate killed them. So if it takes three times
to electrocute someone and there hair catches on fire, or the chemicals are not mixed
right for the injection and it is not painless or the noose is not tied right and it
takes five minutes for them to die, or when the pellets are dropped and they cough and
gag as they gasp for air, chances are it was not half as bad as what the victim went
through. Although the criminal Gulbin - 6 should not be offered a painless death, there
are methods that can be used that are completely painless. One such method is
asphyxiation by nitrogen. With nitrogen the inmate would not feel any pain, a couple of
minutes after the nitrogen is pumped into the room they would go unconscious. Then they
would die painlessly in the next couple of minutes. Another plus to this method is that
their organs could be donated to hospitals. This method would save lives by taking a
criminal off the streets and giving organs to a dying person. There is a chance that an
innocent person could be convicted and executed by mistake. While this is a chance, it is
not a very probable thing to happen. Today's legal system has may things to prevent this.
Trials for capital crimes have to phases. The first phase is only concerned with the
guilt of the accused. The second phase is devoted to the issue of the sentence. Also with
the advancements in technology with DNA and such, we are able to prove most times with
out a doubt if someone committed the crime. Out of the eight thousand criminals that have
been executed, it is thought that only twenty-three of them may have been innocent. Out
of these twenty-three cases twelve had very little or no evidence to prove that the
person was guilty. The United States is the last major commercial country in the west
that is still using the death penalty. Some say that this shows that we should stop
because everyone else is, but this quote from Ernest Van den Hag makes a valid point, I
can't give much weight to the argument suggested by Prof. Conrad because many Gulbin - 7
countries have abolished the death penalty, we to should abolish it. If many countries
follow the Soviets and institute cruel concentration camps, should we to follow? Should
our national decisions follow international fashion? This country has a fairly large
crime problem and it is about time that it buckles down and takes action against it. This
country is being to easy on criminals and not being fair to the law abiding citizens. The
streets should be made safer for everyone. Police are on the streets trying to make this
a safer place to live, and they should not have to worry, that the next person they pull
over for speeding is going to pull out a gun and kill them to try and avoid being
arrested. People like that should not have a chance to commit an atrocity like that more
than once and others thinking about it should have a reason to be scarred away by the
fact they may loose there life it they pull the trigger. So while there are still people
that say it is a much better solution to put criminals in jail for life, should research
the subject deeper and see all of the benefits of capital punishment and how it could
better the United States. The money that is saved from this should be used for important
things such as schools, the homeless, and people who need and deserve it. It should not
be used so a heartless murderer can stay alive in jail and possibly kill again. When it
comes down to it, there is not reason that the death penalty should not be used and not
used more often.