FREE ESSAY ON EVOLUTION VS. CREATION

EVOLUTION VS. CREATION

Evolution vs. Creation
Evolution versus Creationism is a hot topic that is in constant debate among scientists
and Christians. Held in high regard to the world of science, Evolution, is the theory
that groups of organisms change with passage of time, mainly as a result of natural
selection, so that descendants differ morphologically and physiologically from their
ancestors. On the other hand, faith of millions of Christians hold the truth that, the
act of GOD by which the whole entire world was brought into existence is where the basis
of everything in existence today came from. In regards to the two arguments above, my
entire ballot is supporting the views and ideas of the Creation theory. 
Evolution is a theory that is based on science and concrete evidence. Faith is in no way,
shape, or form, a factor that influences the ideas and theories supported by Scientists.
Faithless and blind, the world of science chooses to support a claim that is shattered by
the faith of millions and millions of Christians. In my argument, there are several ideas
that I have researched on the internet as to why evolution is an invalid theory, and is
to be disregarded as the basis for such a fine genre of study, such a science. 
Evolution is a process that cannot take place unless mutations that are random occur. In
the instance of animal's advanced mechanisms of defense, random mutation could not
produce them. A specific beetle dubbed the "bombardier beetle" possesses two chemical
tanks in its body. Upon attacking the beetle, two different chemicals in the tanks are
sprayed from the body. Combined in the air, a hot explosion is produced in the face of
the predator. In light of evolution, when the initial mutations occurred and the tanks
were just starting to form but were not yet able to function properly, they would serve
no purpose to the beetle. Thousands of mutations, and millions of years would be need to
produce the end result of the beetles defense, especially since the mechanism would not
aide the animal in any survival advantage until it was fully developed. Plus, mutations
are random and they never would be able to follow a pattern that would exhibit the end
result of the beetle's defense mechanism. Evolution simply does not work. Evolution would
be comparable to copying a computer program over to a computer that would randomly change
one byte during each copy process. You could copy the program a billion times but the
result would only produce a program that does not function, not a program with added
features. 
Another point to be observed when taking consideration into the theory of evolution is
the proposed idea of intermediate fossils. The basic problem is that, there are no
intermediate fossils. If evolution were a theory that held truth, there would be numerous
examples of animals, which are between the stages of development of different
characteristics. For example, there is yet to be a discovery of a fossil that exhibits
how wings developed. There is no fossil that objectifies a creature or animal that has a
forelimb that is halfway between being an arm, and half way between being a leg. That is
one more reason that nullifies the idea of evolution. 
Another factor that does not support the idea of evolution is the factor of DNA. All
observed mutations of DNA cause a loss of DNA information. All experiments in the
laboratory that include DNA of mutated specimens always show a loss of DNA information.
For evolution to truly take place there must be the addition of new data to the DNA
chain, yet there has never been the case to this point. Oddly enough, many supporters of
evolution always show animals that have lost some feature, de-evolution, and regard that
as an example of evolution?
Closing my researched ideas falsifying evolution, it is shown that there are three major
aspects alone, not including others, why evolution is not a valid theory of creation.
Since mutations are random, they would never be able to follow a set pattern to achieve
the end result of a set species. Intermediate fossils that would support the claim of
evolving animals do not exist. Plus, DNA of species with mutations always shows a loss of
DNA. Evolution is a theory that should not be blindly accepted with out extensive
research. For the basis of science to be on concrete evidence and facts, they are lacking
many of those aspects when it comes to the support of evolution.