FREE ESSAY ON LIBERTY

LIBERTY

Leviathan
Liberty is the natural rights of all mankind. It was even created even before our time.
Since we have so much freedom, we are in jeopardy by one another due to the fact that we
threaten one's will. Competition, aggression, and warfare are always taken place for
existence and self-preservation. This is the worse of human nature. We are always
striving for peace and serenity, and we do everything that it takes to achieve security
for oneself. We all want liberty, but in reality, there is barely any liberty here. As
for an example, if a living aquatic animal was to reside all his life in water, it is
restrained within the contour boundaries that separates land from water. However, in
order to live peacefully without fear, we tend to give up our natural rights to attain
our true liberty. 
Hobbes defines liberty in a different sense. He believes liberty minus all the things
that you have to sacrifice in order to obtain true liberty. In other words, we have to
surrender certain natural rights to achieve peace and harmony with oneself. He believes
each individual can be threatened by one another causing them to be in a state of war.
All subjects are willing to go any distance to preserve their own life. Since there are
limited resources, each form could possibly desire the same object that will give him the
power to continue his existence, resulting warfare in obtaining those objects will be a
characteristic of the natural state of man. He believes warfare will be continual as long
as seeking of power is continual, which leads to constant fear. In the state of nature,
there is always competition, aggression, and warfare; therefore, there is no peace,
harmony, and equality. Thus, this force the individuals to form a social contract with
the sovereign. They are basically transferring their rights to the government to provide
them with security and felicity. However, when entering a contract with the sovereign,
the rights of the individuals will be formally restrained, which is the product of true
liberty. The sovereign forms a set of natural laws that each individual will follow to
prevent their extinction. Once the individual enters the contract, the individual has to
obey the commands of the sovereign regardless if they are dangerous and dishonorable. For
example, one must go to war to protect the sovereign when it is endanger even if one has
to risk his own life to protect the state or to protect oneself. If one refuses to defend
for the sovereign, it would not be consider unjust due to the fact that the sovereign
must punish to maintain order in the government. Hobbes really believes that monarchy has
what it takes to retain our tranquility. He believes if there is only man to rule, then
there is no need to divide the powers among the others. There will be fewer conflicts. He
also believes that he cannot disagree with himself out of envy or interest, but assembly
can, which can lead to a war. Although it is ruled by one man, he can still consider in
hearing the people's opinion to give him advice to execute their needs. 
Simply there are only three kinds of government or commonwealth, which is democracy,
monarchy, and oligarchy. While monarchy and oligarchy are dictated by rulers, democracy
is ruled by the people. The only difference between monarchy and oligarchy is the number
of rulers. Monarchy rules by one, which is a king. And oligarchy rules by a few
dictators. In my opinion, I believe there is no alternative form of government that can
protect our true liberty. If our sovereign is a democracy, we will be in chaos due to the
fact that it rules by the people. That is basically starts from square one even before a
government is created. There will be many conflicts in opinions and beliefs, which can
lead to hatred among each other, resulting warfare. Things will be more complicated to
accomplish to each individual's needs, which results failure of the government. Speaking
of failure of the government, I also believe that oligarchy is also chaotic because
conflicts can take place among the rulers. They can each feel threaten by one another,
which force them to be more powerful. In doing so, a conspiracy can be created and
destroy the other rulers if disagreements arise. In the other hand, monarchy is the best
solution, which I also agreed with Hobbes. I believe that it can protect our true
liberty. It creates fewer controversies and violence. It is also hard to be corrupted due
to favoritism and flattery according to Hobbes, such where an assembly may be. Within a
monarchy, there is really no struggle for power; the king himself is the law. However,
there are limits to his powers. 
Although I really don't believe democracy and oligarchy can be taken seriously in
governing our true liberty, our present day government is democracy. Yet, I still don't
believe that are no other alternative form of government that can protect our true
liberty. In modern times, respectively today, our government is deceived one way or
another. I believe politicians nowadays are corrupted such as the Watergate scandal.
There are briberies for elections or new laws to be execute. Conspiracies are created
among the political parties to achieve their best self-interest.